G8JNJ

I wouldn't trust a Chinese made torque wrench.

It's unlikely that the KiWi will be repeatedly connected and disconnected as much as some other equipment.

Slightly past hand tight is fine, and don't use a big adjustable wrench.

Regards,

Martin

An End Fed wire antenna is by it's nature not balanced, and they have a reputation as tending to be noise magnets. A wire dipole, loop or active loop are better options.

With your KiWi a lack of signal level seems to be the main issue. Even if there are few signals I would expect to be seeing more noise.

Is the loop antenna (I assume an MLA-30) powered correctly ?

If it is an ML-30 have you experimented with the two gain controls (one in the bias tee, the other in the loop amplifier) ?

Regards,

Martin

Unbalanced antennas are prone to noise pickup on the feed line.

Use a balanced antenna if you can, as this will provide better results.

Concentrate on the Signal to Noise Ratio rather than absolute signal strength.

A good transmit antenna is not necessarily a good receive antenna. Antenna efficiency is important on transmit, but much less so when only used for receive.

Site an antenna for the lowest noise level rather than the strongest signals.

With receive systems, it is the Signal to Noise Ratio that matters. As long as the antenna gain / sensitivity is sufficient to raise the receiver noise floor by 6dB relative to a screened 50 ohm load, then you can't improve the antenna performance any further, other than by increasing the directivity.

Directivity increases the gain in the required direction, but more importantly reduces gain in unwanted directions, including noise sources. If you have much more than 6dB increase in noise floor, you are eating away at your receiver's dynamic range, and this is especially important with wideband receivers such as the KiWi.

Owen Duffy (one of my heroes) introduced the concept of Signal to Noise Degradation, and he has many posts on the subject.

https://owenduffy.net/blog/?p=30632

ITU noise curves and required receiver noise figure. For reference, the KiWi NF is around 14dB, which is adequate at 30MHz.

https://owenduffy.net/blog/?p=15700

As you can see, a very high noise figure receiver is adequate at 1MHz, which is why electrically short active antennas can still work well at such low frequencies.

Regards,

Martin

The GPS puck is designed to mounted on a car, so it has to be siting to a metal surface in order to have an adequate ground plane, and function correctly.

It doesn't need to be anything sophisticated, and something like a biscuit tin, or similar, is fine.

Almost anything will do, but it does help improve the polar diagram and overall sensitivity.

Regards,

Martin

In my linear supplies, I had to swap conventional silicon rectifiers for Schottky types, as the 1.6 voltage drop and 3A + forward current was producing about 5 w of heat.

The downside of Schottky types, is that they have faster switching times, and as a result, they can produce additional RF interference, unless extra R & C snubbing components are added.

Regards,

Martin

To be honest, I'm not surprised.

Many European based short wave broadcasters in the 31m / 9MHz band are massive signals during early evening / night time here in the UK, and we are not even in the target service area.

I have to reduce their level by 20dB using an external notch filter, otherwise the KiWi complains quite badly.

The Voice or Turkey on 9460kHz is particularly problematic, as it targets Europe.

If you want a further challenge, try using the HFDL extension on different frequencies, to receive aircraft and ground stations, these will give you a better idea of what your Kiwi and loop are actually capable of.

Regards,

Martin

It looks like a modulation sideband from the Radio China broadcast station, I'd guess it was similar on the others sideband too. The music played on Radio China, tends to include a lot of flute type instruments, which produce extended sidebands with regular harmonic patterns that can resemble data type signals on the waterfall.

There are also Chinese jamming signals that attempt to make the Voice of Hope unusable, that also sound a bit like data, but I don't think that is what you have received in this instance.

I don't think this forum allows the attachment of audio recordings, so you maybe better off asking questions like this on the UDXF IO forum.

Regards,

Martin

You will have difficulty decoding anything from that signal, it is US Navy, 850Hz shift 50bd KW-46 Encrypted, Lualualei, Hawaii.

Try using some of the KiWi's preset stations in the FSK extension, to get a better "feel" for the different shifts and baud rates.

The most common FSK signals tend to be Russian 200Hz (or near) shift "BEE" format.

https://www.sigidwiki.com/wiki/CIS-36-50

https://www.sigidwiki.com/wiki/CIS-50-50

Regards,

Martin

If you click on the column headers Internal / HF / External on the http://rx.linkfanel.net/ webpage, it will sort that column in descending order.

Personally, I like to sort by the HF value, as that is often a better indicator of actual performance.

However, the whole SNR measurement process can only really be used as a rough guide, and unfortunately the majority of KiWi installations are badly let down by poor antennas, often in very noisy urban locations.

The KiWi's in the top 10% (70 out of approx 700) SNR scores, are generally OK, but some of the rest are really awful, which is a great pity, and IMHO a great waste of resource.

Purchasing a receiver is only a very small part in the overall process of receiving signals. Although you can't really do without one, even a top of the range model, isn't going to make up for a poor antenna.

Signal to Noise Ratio is what matters, not absolute signal strength. Good transmit antennas don't always make good receive antennas, as they are required to do different things.

I'll keep on repeating this mantra until things improve, but I suspect I'll die first...

Regards,

Martin